A baseball writer who has a Hall of Fame vote actually stated he didn't vote for Curt Schilling because of his World War II collection which included swastikas and Nazi Germany artifacts. The writer went on to say he voted for Schilling in the past but when he found out about his WWII collection he just could no longer vote for him.
The slippery slope of the character clause has made this whole process stupid. It is a BASEBALL Hall of Fame. Why can't we keep it at that. I am biased when it comes to Curt Schilling the baseball player. I am not biased when it comes to his politics. There are things I agree with him on and there are things where I think he has lost his mind. It doesn't matter though because it should be about baseball.
I used to be someone that didn't want the steroid guys in the Hall of Fame. The problem is nobody knows who was really on them and who wasn't on them. All we can do is guess. It is time to get rid of the character clause and just judge a guy by what he does on the baseball field in relation to his peers during the time he played. My Hall of Fame ballot is strictly by the numbers. It is just easier that way.
I look at five categories to determine who should be in the Hall of Fame from this ballot. Here they are:
The first category is the Hall of Fame Monitor. The HOFM is a Bill James creation that determines how likely it is that a player will make the Hall of Fame. 100 is likely with 130 and above a cinch.
The second category I looked at was Hall of Fame Career Standards, another Bill James creation where the average Hall of Famer has a score of 50 with the highest number being 100.
The third category I use is Wins Above Replacement (WAR). I know this isn't perfect but I am a WAR guy. It usually validates to me what my eyes see.
The forth category is WAR/7 which takes the average of a players 7 best seasons. I am not a big fan of compilers. I want to see how dominant you were and this stat is great for that.
The fifth and final category is JAWS or the Jaffe War Score System. This system measures a player's Hall of Fame worthiness by comparing him to the players at his position who are already enshrined, using advanced metrics to account for the wide variations in offensive levels that have occurred throughout the game's history.
Now that my categories are set I listed the top ten buys for each category who are on the ballot. If a player appears in the top ten in all five categories then he is a 5 star guy and so on. Here is what we found:
Five Star Guys
Four Star Guys
Three Star Guys
Since you have ten spots on the ballot the eight guys who appear on the Five Star and Four Star lists should be in. There are now two spots left but four guys in that three star category. I have no problem voting for a guy that was a DH but he needs to be a slam dunk. In this case, Martinez is not a slam dunk so I can't vote for him this time around. Forget the steroid talk, Sammy Sosa was not as good of an all around player as either Raines or Vladdy.
My baseball ballot for 2017 looks like this:
Here is the chart to see where each player ranks:
|Player||HOF Monitor||Player||HOF Standards||Player||WAR||Player||WAR/7||Player||JAWS|